HomeCouncil MembersAgency DirectoryConstitutionConferenceMeeting PresentationCUAC Business

 

http://cuac.wustl.edu/vertical.jpg

 

General Meeting - Annual Federal Agencies Presentations
    

 

 

 

General Meeting

 

                 FY 2007                              FY 2006                                   FY 2005                             FY 2004

                                                              FY 2003                                   FY 2002                             FY 2001

                                                              FY 2000                                   FY 1999                             FY 1998

 

 

 

 

CARTOGRAPHIC USERS ADVISORY COUNCIL (CUAC) 2006 MEETING MINUTES

May 4-5, 2006

George Washington Carver Center/USDA

Beltsville, Maryland

 

 

 

 

CUAC Members:

Joe Aufmuth, University of Florida, MAGERT

Michael Fry, University of Maryland, WAML

Katie Lage, University of Colorado at Boulder, WAML

Mary McInroy, University of Iowa, GODORT

Clara P. McLeod, Washington University, GSIS

Bruce Obenhaus, Virginia Tech, SLA Social Science Division, G&M       

Anita Oser, SLA, Social Science Division, G&M

Daniel T. Seldin, Indiana University, NACIS

Joy Suh, George Mason University, GODORT

Thelma Thompson, University of New Hampshire, NEMO

Linda Zellmer, Indiana University, GSIS

 

 

Agency Presenters:

 

Christine Clarke, introductory remarks

George Rohaley, National Remote Sensing Leader, USDA-NRCS

Susan J. DeLost, Program Manager, Geospatial Services, USDA Forest Service

Dr. Brett L. Abrams, Electronic Records Archivist (NARA) and Chair of the Historical Data

  Working Group/FGDC

Bob Bewley, Senior Geographer, Bureau of Land Management

Carol Brandt, Geospatial Information Program Manager, Bureau of Transportation

  Statistics/DOT

Gregory J Allord, Science Information and Education Office, Geological Survey

Michael P. McDermott, National Coordinator, Natural Science Network, Geological  

  Survey

William R. “Bill” Effland, Soil Scientist, USDA/NRCS Soil Survey Division

Tim Trainor, Assistant Division Chief for Geographic Areas and Cartographic Data Products,

  Geography Division

Robin L. Haun-Mohamed, Director, Collection Mgmt & Preservation, GPO

Ted Preibe, Director, Library Planning & Development, GPO

Dr. John R. Hébert, Chief, Geography and Map Division, Library of Congress

 

 

Submitted Written Agency Report:

            Department of Energy

 

Federal Agency Presentations Schedule

 

Thursday PM, 4 May, beginning 1:15 PM

1:15—Welcome, introductions, (remarks by Christine Clarke, NCRS)

1:30-- Remote sensing/NRCS, George Rohaley

2:00--USFS, Susan DeLost

2:30--NARA, Brett Abrams

3:00--BLM, Bob Bewley

3:30, closing remarks and thank yous to agencies

 

Friday, May 5, 2006, beginning 9AM

9:00-- Welcome, introductions, last-minute preparations

9:15-- BTS, Carol Brandt

9:45—USGS, Greg Allord and Mike McDermott

10:30-10:45--break

10:45--Soil Survey/NRCS, Bill Effland

11:30--CENSUS, Tim Trainor

LUNCH—USDA cafeteria

1:00--GPO, Robin L. Haun-Mohamed and Ted Priebe

1:45--LC/G&M, John Hébert

2:30, closing remarks and thank yous to agencies


Introductory Session Remarks: Christine Clarke, NCRS.

Chris begins by explaining that she is with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), one of roughly 27 organizational units in the USDA.  USDA has over 100,000 staff and NRCS, Farm and Service Agency and Rural Development are considered the 3 field based agencies, meaning that they have staff in almost every county in the nation.  NRCS changed its name from the Soil Conservation Service in 1994, and before that they were the Soil Erosion Service (1935) under the DOI. Their purpose at that time was to mediate and minimize the negative impacts of the dust bowl and wind erosion. Today, the agency focuses on land management, conservation, and working with farmers, ranchers, and land owners at the local field level.  They have approximately 150 GIS specialists in the field.  Some staff are district conservationists that are using a Customer Service Tool kit (CST), which is an application built on top of ESRI products like ArcMap.  This is a user friendly interface that can be used in all fifty states to develop farm plans, view DOQs, or aerial photos. Other GIS users work more with raw data and support CST users. The agency is also involved in the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Geo-spatial One Stop, and the Geo-spatial Line of Business (GeoLOB).

 

Brief Q&A period:

1. Do you think that the government will go to a more centralized funding system?

Answer:  That’s a possibility, but it’s a challenge to compare GIS activities across disciplines.  Christine welcomes help in building a foundation for GIS use with standard data sets and infrastructure.

 

Question:  Has the USDA Geospatial Data Gateway limited access to data to non .gov users?

Answer:  Yes, The Gateway was developed to deliver authoritative data to USDA agency field staff.  Due to the convenience of the data access via the Gateway, non federal use increased substantially over time.  To ensure non-federal users acquired the most up to date data from the appropriate sources, outside users are now redirected to the authoritative data source.  In doing so, USDA does not incur distribution responsibilities for data of which we are not the authoritative source and users are ensured the most current information. They only turned off those layers for which they were not the authoritative source for the data sets (for example, data kept by USGS).

 

Question:  Is there state-wide aerial photography available on the USDA site?

Answer:  The most current aerial photography available from USDA can be found at  http://www.apfo.usda.gov/

(submitted by Clara McLeod)

 

 

George Rohaley, NRCS-Remote Sensing Leader

George Rohaley’s talk, “Use of Remote Sensing in USDA and NRCS,” included a brief overview of the use of remote sensing in NRCS, imagery sources, applications of imagery, USDA image archive and distribution, and USDA NAIP (National Agricultural Imagery Program), which is one of the biggest imagery programs in USDA. He also discussed smaller projects that are specific for NRCS and showed more than 100 slides in the presentation.

 

The mission of National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) is to help people conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment. In short, NRCS mission is “helping people help the land.”

 

Most of NRCS’s acquired imagery comes from three sources: Satellites, High and Low Altitude Airborne cameras and digital sensors. NRCS acquires imagery for it’s people who work on the ground at the USDA county service centers (about 3000 offices). The Service Centers have converted from using analog data to mostly using digital data today. The centers have ArcGIS and use agency business-oriented tools called “Customer Service Toolkit.” Orthoimagery is used as a base map for all GIS data layers at the Service Centers.

 

Most of the imagery NCRS uses comes from airborne system (film or digital). Typically the Service Centers prefer airborne images with natural color because it is visually more relatable to actual ground situations. Recently, however, USDA contractors are flying more imagery with digital sensors. We have been told that digital imagery cannot be used in court, attorneys account for a small demand for film images.

 

Along with Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), Farm Service Agency (FSA), and Forest Service (FS), NCRS is one of top four imagery users in USDA. (Others include National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS), Risk Management Agency (RMA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).)

 

Applications of imagery within USDA include agricultural competitiveness, agro-terrorism, base map, carbon synthesis, compliance, base area, crop monitoring, crop condition assessment, soil survey, disaster monitoring, drought monitoring, earning warning, environmental monitoring, fire suppression, homeland security, resource inventory, invasive species, land use conversion, and yield monitoring. NRCS focuses on soil survey, crop monitoring, environmental monitoring, and resource inventory.

 

Satellite images that NRCS uses primarily come by FAS. FAS has contracted with companies such as Digital Globe, Earthsat, Eurimage, GeoEye, Space Imaging, and SPOT to get world wide images. NRCS can gain access to FAS images (Rohaley showed several slides for 03, 04, 05 LANDSAT acquisitions showing good coverage of US area and 06 AWIFs acquisition). The FAS Web site, Crop Explorer (http://www.pedcad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer), provides image and data services for weather, soil moisture, crop, and vegetation conditions.  One can pick up a region, browse, and download MODIS images. These satellite images (250-m) are in JPEG 2000 and GeoTiff formats and can be imported into GIS.  2006 acquisition will include commercial satellite imagery for Pacific region (Hawaii) and Alaska.  These satellite images will be accessible to the public at a degraded resolution.

 

USDA Image Archive and Distribution:

 All aerial photographs and digital imagery acquired by NRCS must be contracted by the USDA Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO).  Located in Salt Lake City, Utah, APFO provides contracting support for the department’s aerial photography needs. It has one of the largest collections of historical aerial photos dating back to the mid 1950’s. It provides a centralized photo and imagery archive library (55,000 rolls of film and 84,000 photo indices). The system has been automated, cataloged, and is easily retrievable. Custom scanning of historical images are available. Films, photos, CDs, and DVDs are stored in controlled environments.

 

USDA Aerial Contract Awards:

Most of these image acquisitions are done based on contract awards.  FY2005 contract awards are over 30 million ($ 33,455,497).  The contract awards have substantially increased in the last three years. Most of the funding (71 %) goes to USDA NAIP. See the Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) Web site (http://www.apfo.usda.gov/) for image status, contracting services, and any other information.

 

USDA Small Area Photography Contracting:

NRCS has been involved with a small area photography and aerial photographic contracting project. This project is a five-year contract to acquire very high resolution imagery (1:4000 to 1:15,840 scale) under a  indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity contract and for specific task orders in smaller areas such as National Resource Inventory (NRI) sites, which acquires imagery resolution that results in a ground resolving distance of 2.5 inches. Why is such high resolution required? Each year, NRI acquires approximately 70,000 sites a quarter acre in size to do as inventory.  In the past, inventory was site specific, but now it is done primarily by photographic interpretation techniques. NRCS has specific photographic periods, mostly in growing seasons. The NRCS contractors update their projects status every two or three days through the web.  Data collection will be done using remote sensing techniques at three remote sensing laboratories: Greensboro, NC, Fort Worth, TX, and Portland OR. During FY 05, six vendors were awarded to cover small areas such as NRI photo stations (9”x 9” photos). There are 71,514 NRI photo locations in FY 06.

 

National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP):

This program is USDA’s largest imagery program, acquiring 1 and 2 meter natural color digital ortho imagery during the agricultural growing season (summer).  NAIP updates 1 meter resolution images on a 5 year cycle.  Digital Compressed County Mosaic (CCM) has improved image quality due to a 15:1 compression ratio instead of the 50:1 ratio that was available in 2004/2005. It is available 30 days after acquisition via USDA Geospatial Data Gateway (http://gdw.apfo.usda.gov/naip/viewer). The program has over 23 million ($23,795,354) in 2005 in terms of funding. The program has been additionally successful  because of federal and state cooperative partnerships. Each year NAIP has a set of states for contracting. Why do we acquire so much ortho imagery now? Technology and contracting have made the process price less expensive--the average cost for 1 meter ortho rectified ($ 171.85 per DOQQ) and 2 meter rectified ($158.82 per DOQQ). Costs are more affordable because vendors are allowed to resell “derived” or value added material after contract products. NAIP contract awards have been increased from 9 million to 30 million from 2003 to 2006.  There are many more subcontractors willing to do this work for NAIP. In 2005, most of the country was covered (in comparison to a mere about 5 states in the past).  There are states that are covered by 1 or 2 meter resolution.  FSA acquires 2 meter digital ortho images for an entire county and delivery is required within 30 days. NRCS primarily focuses on acquiring images in 1 meter states through partnerships. Those states that have old images are given priority for updating by NRCS.   Trend is changing from film to digital sensors (it is believed 50 % are covered by digital in 2006 and 60 % will be in 2008). Rohaley showed some of NAIP mosaic imagery to show the improved accuracy by changed resolution (1 or 2 meter) and compression ratio from 2004 to 2005. Compressed mosaics are available to the public through USDA Data Gateway, but higher resolution digital data is only available by order.

 

Distribution links for future information and data include:

·         USDA Aerial Photography Field Office (http://gdw.apfo.usda.gov/naip/viewer) for NAIP and USDA Aerial Imagery.

·         USDA Data Gateway (http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/) for data products packaged by county.

·         Foreign Agricultural Crop Explorer (http://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer) for global image, weather, etc. 

 

 

Digital Elevation Model (DEM):

NRCS has contracted to acquire DEM data. Most DEM data is in the public domain. Digital elevation is used for land use planning and soil surveys.  When combined with digital ortho imagery, digital elevation allows updating soil survey mapping on laptops rather than from the ground (soil survey and DEM will be covered in detail at tomorrow’s presentation).

 

Imagery for the Nation Proposal:

Everyone wants imagery: local, regional, state, tribal, and federal governments, as well as the private sector.  There is a proposal for three distinct programs under imagery for the nation: one meter, one foot, and six-inch acquisition program--a sort of infrastructure.  The one meter program, which will be managed by USDA, would enhance the existing NAIP with the cover of the lower 48 states annually (Hawaii every 3 years; Alaska over 5 years) with natural color. The one foot program will be managed by USGS, covering everything east of the Mississippi River and counties west of the Mississippi River with populations more than 25 people/square miles, every 3 years with natural color. The six-inch program, which will be managed by USGS, will cover all urbanized areas per U.S. Census Bureau definitions (more than 50,000 populations with more than 1,000 people per square mile) every 3 years with natural color. Annual total estimated budget for production, quality control, and archive and distribution, is $114 million. Expected taxpayer savings by replacing the existing local, state, tribal and federal programs with one consistent national program is $159 million.

 

Questions/discussion:

CUAC: What happened to National High Altitude Photography (NHAP) program, DOQs, and its creation with one meter accuracy?

 

The NHAP program was replaced by National Aerial Photography Program (NAPP), which was administrated by USGS.  NAPP is now gone.

NAPP produced the original source of ortho images based on 1:40K scale and mostly black & white. However, NRCS and most of USDA do not need NAPP product. NRCS, USDA, and Farm Service Agency also need natural color images. Therefore, NAPP went to NAIP. The soil survey program still needs leaf-off images such as black and white, but can get them from archives at the USDA Aerial Field Office.

 

 

CUAC: Is there any back up system for the CD-Rom product in case there is damage the CDs stored at the USDA Aerial Field Office in Salt Lake City?  

 

CDs and fire wire drives are used to deliver NAIP items. Now they are on a server.  The products come in multiple copies, and states which use the images have back-up copies.  Film life span is 75 years old.

(Submitted by Joy Suh)

 

 

Susan J. DeLost, Program Manager, Geospatial Services, USDA Forest Service

 

Susan DeLost, Geospatial Services Program Manager, spoke about “USDA Forest Service Maps and Other Related Products” on Thursday May 4, 2006. She began by giving an overview of the land managed by the USFS and the mission of the USFS. Maps and geospatial data support the activities of the USFS in a number of areas, including: forest planning, forest health protection, watershed restoration, fire prevention & management, and recreation. The USFS participates in interagency coordination with the FGDC and partners with the USGS, the BLM, and other organizations (federal, tribal, state, local) to increase efficiency and provide additional services and products to its customers.

 

Maps have been an integral part of the USFS activities since the agency’s establishment in 1905 and are a vital part of managing the national forests and grasslands.  Maps were initially produced at the local unit level, with little standardization or consistency.  Since the mid-1970’s, with the establishment of the USFS’ Geospatial Service and Technology Center (GSTC), the emphasis on standardization has increased, while still allowing flexibility for local needs. The GSTC works closely with the agency’s national forest units and Regional Offices to produce map products, geospatial data and related applications.  The GSTC and the Remote Sensing Applications Center (RSAC) units of the USFS, co-located in Salt Lake City, Utah, are leaders in providing geospatial information products, training, and technical support to the agency and its many partners. Susan distributed a CD entitled “A Legacy of Forest Service Mapping” to all CUAC members, which gives more information about this history.

 

Susan showed the traditional mapping products produced by the USFS: general maps, forest visitor maps, topographic maps, and specialty maps and brochures (http://www.fs.fed.us/maps/). She brought samples of some of these maps to share with the group. They have just finished updating the map for the brochure, “A Guide to Your National Forests and Grasslands”, which was last updated in 2000. Another agency map product is the Forest/Grassland Visitor Map, which has traditionally been produced at a scale of ½” = 1 mile.  Some forests are now producing these at the 1” = 1 mile scale.   

 

In 1992, the USFS entered into an agreement with the USGS to produce a single-edition 1:24,000 (1:63,360 in Alaska) topographic map product covering national forest lands.  This product replaces the two similar topographic quad products that each agency had previously produced over the same areas.  The USGS and USFS jointly developed a standard for this series, which incorporates the traditional USGS 1:24,000 topographic quad standards and USFS-specific information.  They are updated every 7-10 years.  Under the agreement, the USGS has the responsibility for printing and distributing these maps.  As a result of this agreement, the federal government has realized savings as one map per area is produced, instead of two, as had been the case prior to the establishment of the single-edition agreement.  

 

The USFS is a voting member on the Board on Geographic Names (BGN).  Betsy Kanalley is the USFS/USDA representative to the BGN and is the current chair of the BGN’s Domestic Names Committee. The USFS participates in updating and maintaining the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS).

 

Susan discussed and showed the FS Geodata Clearinghouse (http://fsgeodata.sc.egov.usda.gov/), which provides access to metadata and downloadable data created by the USFS. She also showed a web-GIS service for active fire mapping, linked from the FS Geodata Clearinghouse.

 

Susan also demonstrated a new USFS Geoportal intra-net site, which provides one-stop shopping for geospatial information for agency employees.

 

The USFS is working on a number of new geospatial tools and products: the Geospatial Interface, Carto Tools, MPS Atlas, Print-on-Demand, and additional web-based data and services.  The Geospatial Interface is essentially an ESRI- ArcMapTM extension that allows users to easily retrieve, view and use spatial and tabular data related to their subject area, which are stored in a number of databases across the agency.

 

Carto Tools provides map templates for various USFS map products that are included in documents (e.g., Forest Plan Revisions and others) and publications to increase the standardization of these products.

 

MPS Atlas is a project that the USFS is working on with ESRI that will incorporate the Carto Tools templates into ArcGIS in order to simplify map production for both standard and unique products.

 

The Print-on-Demand initiative’s goal is to design and implement a print on demand web solution for Single Edition Quadrangles. It will first be implemented internally, with public access planned for the future.  The USFS is exploring opportunities to partner with other service providers, both public and private. This interface will provide access to standard quadrangles and user-selected areas, but will not include the vegetation tint.  One goal is to provide more up-to-date data for displaying and printing maps via a web-based service than is currently possible with the printed map product.  The USFS has not yet developed an archiving process for this product.  Susan suggested that CUAC send a letter to the FGDC and her about the need to archive this data as it is updated.

 

(Submitted by Katie Lage)

 

Dr. Brett L. Abrams, Electronic Records Archivist (NARA) and Chair of the Historical Data Working Group/FGDC

Brett focused his presentation on the activities of the Historical Data Working Group (HDWP) established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to promote “the awareness of the historical dimension to geospatial data which have been financed in whole or part by Federal funds” and to facilitate “maintaining historically valuable geospatial data and making it available to future generations.”  Current membership includes personnel from USGS’ Eros Data Center, the FSA Aerial Photography Field Office, DOJ, EPA, San Diego Supercomputing Center, CIESIN (Columbia University), NC State University Library, University of Connecticut Library (MAGIC), Boze Allen Hamilton, ESRI, FGDC, and OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium).  The group is chaired by Brett Abrams, NARA.

 

The function of NARA is to assist all federal agencies in managing their records, including geospatial records, throughout their lifecycle and to preserve those records of “enduring” value in the National Archives.  The NARA Appraisal Policy 1441 states that NARA is not only responsible for transferring and storing records under optimal conditions but also that they can be retrieved and their value retained during their assigned retention periods.  Geospatial records that are scheduled as permanent include the Fish and Wildlife’s Wetlands Inventory and Wildlife Refuges Files, The Forest Service’s Fire Management Maps, and the Bureau of the Census 1990 and 1992 version of TIGER/Line files and the 1980 GBF/DIME File.

 

The current standards for the transfer of GIS records consist of the FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata, the Spatial Data Transfer Standard (SDTS), GML v.3.1.1 and Simple Features Profile.  The SDTS is not ideal in that it is cumbersome and USGS is not completing scheduled maintenance.  GML v.3.1.1 and Simple Features Profiles are also problematic in that there is significant complexity and variability in some of its elements.  In addition, the schemas are not saved as a part of the “archival bundle,” but are instead url addresses to websites that will probably become outdated.  Thus both SDTS and GML v.3.1.1 have questionable value for archival purposes.

 

Currently the HDWG is pursuing building a community among individuals and organizations interested in the historical dimension to geographical data, including maintaining a website with a library of information and a discussion component available to members.  Future initiatives for the working group include creating a Geospatial One Stop Portal Community for historical collections such as those at NARA and the Library of Congress; developing application schema and archival profile using GML and simple features profile; and increasing the scanning of historical maps.

 

The following two links provide additional information about the Historical Data Working Group:

 

Link to the main page:

http://www.fgdc.gov/participation/working-groups-subcommittees/hdwg/index_html

 

Link to the library page:

http://www.fgdc.gov/participation/working-groups-subcommittees/hdwg/folder_contents

(Submitted by Anita K. Oser)

 

 

Bob Bewley, Senior Geographer, Bureau of Land Management

Bob Bewley, Senior Geographer at the Bureau of Land Management, presented to CUAC on Thursday May 4, 2006. He spoke about the BLM’s enterprise GIS, the National Integrated Lands System, national data sets, data sharing, and showed some examples of BLM maps.

 

The BLM is the largest land management agency, managing 262 million acres. In 1948 the General Land Office merged with the agency in charge of grazing on public lands to for the Bureau of Land Management. The BLM’s mandate comes from the 1976 Federal Lands Policy Act.

 

The BLM is in the process of creating an enterprise GIS. An enterprise GIS is defined as, “… a business-wide GIS that is characterized by standard data, in a transactional format that allows update, maintenance and use by all levels of the organization.” The BLM’s enterprise GIS will support standardized data and serve out core datasets across all levels of the agency in support of the BLM’s goals. Bob explained that the creation of an enterprise GIS needs: data standards, software and hardware, telecom support, the personnel to create and support it, and business/management support.

 

The BLM is exploring two models of an enterprise GIS: a state model and a national model. The state model will serve out resource data, standardized by state. This data will include such data as wildlife habitats, range improvements, etc. The national model is the National Integrated Land System (NILS) at http://www.geocommunicator.gov/. NILS serves out land records, base maps, and some resource data. The majority of the resource data is collected at 1:24,000. The land records parcel data is generated from legal land descriptions and the Geographic Coordinate Data Base (GCDB).  GCDB  is cadastral ground survey data, decoded from old survey maps and survey data entered from recent cadastral projects.  NILS includes feature-level metadata. The BLM plans on working with other agencies to add data for non-public lands to NILS.

 

Bob showed CUAC examples of the Land and Mineral Use Records Viewer in NILS. The national data sets included in NILS are: range allotments, areas of critical environmental concern, land use planning boundaries, BLM administrative units, national lands conservation system, surface management agency, oil and gas leases, mining claims, and geothermal leases.

 

NILS also includes some USFS data, as the BLM partners with USFS to serve it out. For example, the Land and Mineral Use Records Viewer displays data about the recent USFS Rural Schools Conveyance proposal. The BLM’s policy is to share data between federal agencies and local and state governments. Bob’s presentation included a list of BLM data administrators by state, included at the end of these minutes.

 

Bob then discussed BLM standard maps. The BLM creates 1:100,000 Surface Management Status maps digitally and prints paper maps. 1:500,000 Surface Management Status maps are created for all western states. Both of these series are updated approximately every 7 years. There was a question from CUAC members about the 1:500,000 maps not coming through the FDLP. Bob suggested we talk with Bill Jackson. He understood that they should be coming through the FDLP. Katie (Lage) said she would contact Bill Jackson. Bob showed examples of both of these standard map series.

 

The BLM also creates specialized maps such as mining maps, potash area maps, and oil and gas reserve maps. These specialized maps use the standard BLM line styles and colors but regional cartographers have more freedom with these types of maps than with the standard 1:100,000 and 1:500,000 maps. Bob showed many examples of the variety of specialized maps produced by the BLM.

 

CUAC members had a question about NILS data being sent out through the FDLP. Bob said that some of the data sets are proprietary. For the non-proprietary data, this might be a possibility. He would talk with GPO about this. CUAC members also inquired if the NILS data is being archived as it is updated and changed. The NILS data is “versioned” and archived on a quarterly basis.

 

BLM Data Administrators

o      ALASKA Linda Ricketts,271-4645907-

o      ARIZONA Rick Selbach, 602-417-9386

o      CALIFORNIA  Rob Cervantes 978 454

o      COLORADO Adrian Caufield, 303-239-3941

o      EASTERN STATES  John Douglas, CIO 202-452-1638

o      IDAHO  Dave Burley, 208-373-4075

o      MONTANA Norma Smith 406-896-5270

o      NEVADA Marguerite McKee 775-861-6519

o      NEW MEXICO Rene Berkhoudt, 505-438-7620

o      Oregon Stan Frazier, 503-808-6009

o      UTAH  Walt Phelps, 801-539-4125

o      WYOMING  Renee Duval, 307-775-6244

o      WASHINGTON OFFICE - Melanie Rhinehart, Data Manager 303-236-9940

o      WASHINGTON OFFICE - IRM POLICY GROUP Jim Horan, 202-452-5023

(Submitted by Katie Lage)

 

 

Carol Brandt, Geospatial Information Program Manager, Bureau of Transportation Statistics/DOT

Carol spoke on the status of the Geospatial Information Program at BTS.  As a result of a February 2005 reorganization, BTS became part of the new Research & Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) within the US Department of Transportation (DOT).  The BTS Geospatial Information Program (BTS/GEO) lost funding this past fiscal year and was forced to discontinue the Internet Mapping Center on their website, thus losing all their online mapping capabilities.  BTS/GEO can no longer support the viewing and downloading of transportation data sets through the web or share mapping applications previously developed.  Currently, BTS/GEO is trying to get the databases back on the web and available for downloading, so patrons will not have to order a data CD.

 

BTS/GEO will continue to: produce the annual National Transportation Atlas Databases (NTAD, a Congressional mandate); provide mapping support to the Crisis Management Center; and work on the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, GeoSpatial One-Stop, and FGDC.  In their roll on the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, BTS/GEO is charged with coordinating the DOT presence and the transportation layer.  The RITA administrator has recently been named to the FGDC steering committee, so this may bring more attention and time involvement to working with that group.  Recently proposed Data Exchange Standards for Geospatial One-Stop were approved by an ANSI sub-committee and have been passed on to ANSI for adoption.  Since their web site with interactive mapping has been taken down, BTD/GEO no longer plays a day-to-day role in Geospatial One-Stop.

 

The 2006 NTAD, due out this summer, will include the usual transportation datasets, as well as the following new information:  Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS); Automatic Traffic Recorder Stations (ATR); Weigh In Motion Stations (WIM); and Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Routes.  Also included in NTAD are the following geographic reference datasets obtained from other agencies: national populated places, urbanized area boundaries, 109th  congressional district boundaries, county and state  boundaries, hydrographic features, metropolitan statistical area boundaries (all from Bureau of the Census), national park boundaries (National Park Service), Metropolitan Planning Organization Boundaries (DOT), non-attainment areas (EPA/DOT), and military bases (Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command, SDDC).  These geographic datasets area way to make the NTAD product a transportation “map in a box,” so users can add GIS capability to the geographic and numeric data included and create their own maps.

 

BTS/GEO provides mapping and analysis support to the Crisis Management Center, including assistance on Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and other emergency situations, as well as handling special mapping/spatial analysis requests from Congress and the DOT Secretary, e.g., air traffic hub mapping and “Annual Rural Airport Analysis” information.   Much of this spatial analysis and information is available internally and on not the web due to the sensitive nature of the data, e.g., pipeline locations.

 

BTS/GEO is currently involved with the Geospatial Line of Business (LoB) federal government initiative.  Geospatial LoB is a new plan for agencies to work together to:  identify opportunities to share common geospatial processes and functions across government; result in a more coordinated approach to producing, maintaining, and using geospatial data; ensure sustainable participation from Federal partners to establish a collaborative model for geospatial-related activities and investments; and influence the FY08 budget cycle.  Since the GLoB scheme was sent to the agencies in March, much of Brandt’s time has been spent on determining how best to work with other agencies to set up and conduct the Geospatial LoB.

 

Until a few years ago, a number of BTS geospatial information products were disseminated through the federal depository program, but this is no longer the case.  Brant and GPO representat